High Metallurgical Recoveries Continue at Splinter Rock
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX Announcement
13 May 2024
ASX: OD6
High Metallurgical Recoveries Continue
at Splinter Rock Project
OD6 Metals Limited (OD6 or the Company) is pleased to announce that high
metallurgical recoveries continue to be achieved at Splinter Rock, from Phase 3
samples tested at the Australian Nuclear Science Organisation (ANSTO).
Highlights:
•
Achieved high metallurgical recoveries, up to 90%, of Magnet Rare Earth Elements (MagREE) in
multiple Prospect areas, across 71 new samples
•
•
Average ~60% MagREE recovery at 25g/l HCl (excluding basin edges and carbonaceous shales)
–
Centre Prospect: 42% to 90% recovery of MagREE
–
Inside Centre Prospect: 44% to 76% recovery of MagREE
–
Prop Prospect: 41% to 77% recovery of MagREE
Importantly recoveries for all magnet rare earth oxides (MagREO) inclusive of Nd, Pr, Dy, Tb are
similar. This is the key to overall project economics for any clay hosted rare earth project.
•
The data is being considered as part of the future Mineral Resource Estimate Upgrade expected to be
available this quarter.
•
Further Phase 4 metallurgical leaching and processing optimisation work underway at ANSTO
•
All assays contained in this ASX announcement are based on the 4-Acid soluble digestion method,
aligning with the reporting of geological drill assays and the Mineral Resource Estimate.
Brett Hazelden, Managing Director, commented:
“The results continue to show that the Splinter Rock Recoveries are as good as or better than the Brazilian Clay
hosted Rare Earth plays that have gained so much attention over the last 12 months, and continues to affirm that
we are Australia’s premier clay-hosted rare earth deposit.
The Inside Centre recoveries of ~60% when combined with grades of between 1,400 to 2,200ppm TREO, across an
extensive 2km by 1km areas, with substantial thicknesses between 20 to 77m, a low stripping ratio, plus low acid
consumptions continues to be a standout for the company.
These metrics align closely with the essential value drivers we believe are crucial for the economic viability of clayhosted rare earth projects both in Australia and globally. At the Splinter Rock Project we have no private royalties,
do not sit over farming land, are located in a known wind and solar renewable energy corridor, plus we are only a
short distance to the major port of Esperance.
We look forward to these factors being considered as part of our future Mineral Resource Estimate upgrade scheduled
for later this quarter”
MagREE (Magnet Rare Earths) = Nd + Pr + Tb + Dy)
MagREO (Magnet Rare Earth Oxide) = Nd2O3 + Pr6O11 + Tb4O7 + Dy2O3
TREO (Total Rare Earth Oxide) = La2O3 + CeO2 + Pr6O11 + Nd2O3 + Sm2O3 + Eu2O3 + Gd2O3 + Tb4O7 + Dy2O3 + Ho2O3 + Er2O3 + Tm2O3 + Yb2O3 + Lu2O3 + Y2O3.
Metallurgical Sample Selection
A total of 71 samples were selected from a wide variety of clays, locations and depths to further develop a geometallurgical understanding of recovery across the various regolith types at our two large prospects at Splinter
Rock (Centre and Prop).
Samples were chosen based on differing geographic locations, REE grades, colours, chemical compositions, AEM
conductivity, proximity to granite, basin position (including paleo valley/channel positions) and inferred
geological genesis. Refer to figures 1, 2 and 3 for Phase 3 sample locations along with those previously
completed during Phases 1 and 2.
Figure 1: Splinter Rock Scrum and Centre metallurgical sample drill hole locations on AEM model clay thickness
2
Figure 2: Splinter Rock Inside Centre metallurgical sample drill hole locations on AEM model clay thickness
Figure 3: Splinter Rock Prop and Flanker metallurgical sample drill hole locations on AEM Model clay thickness
3
Centre Prospect Results
Centre Prospect results are presented in Table 1 and Figure 4. These results are based on three geological
locations, each with its own clay setting and granite basin boundaries. The main Centre Prospect is a large clay
basin located within an elevated tableland, featuring multiple feeder channels and Booanya granite to the north.
Based on the recovery results, the following observations can be made:
Inside Centre
•
Is a significant feeder channel heading northeast into the main Centre Basin
•
MagRE Recoveries (extractions) across all four MagRE elements average between 44% and 76%.
•
Areas on the margin of the clay basin have lower recovery, likely due to the transition between clay and
saprock due to weathering.
•
No carbonaceous shales are found in this channel
Centre North
•
Is a large Clay basin to the north and western edge of the main prospect
•
MagRE Recoveries (extractions) across all four MagRE elements average between 42% to 90%.
•
A carbonaceous shale (black clay) located in parts of the basin is likely the remnants of a historic estuary.
Recoveries and grades of rare earth located in this carbonaceous material are generally lower and have a
corresponding increase in sulphur levels.
•
Below the carbonaceous shales recoveries and grades generally increase significantly.
Centre
•
Is a large Clay Basin covering a vast area in the southern western area of the main prospect
•
MagRE Recoveries (extractions) across all four MagRE elements average between 48% to 68%.
•
Areas on the margin of clay basin have lower recovery, likely due to the transition between clay and
saprock due to weathering.
•
A carbonaceous shale (black clay) located in parts of the basin is likely the remnants of a historic estuary.
Recoveries and grades of rare earth located in this carbonaceous material are generally lower and have a
corresponding increase in sulphur levels.
•
Below the carbonaceous shales recoveries and grades generally increase significantly.
Table 1: Centre Prospect MagRE acid leach recovery for various drill hole locations, intercepts and sample types
Composite ID
Inside
Centre
SRAC0356 51-72m
SRAC0356 72-79m
SRAC0357 39-54m
SRAC0357 54-90m
SRAC0358 36-54m
SRAC0358 54-84m
SRAC0359 27-51m
SRAC0359 51-87m
SRAC0470 33-57m
Head Assay
TREO MagREO
ppm
ppm
1842
454
952
193
2108
479
1787
409
1473
282
1984
595
1495
291
1470
338
2335
539
Nd
%
44%
75%
44%
65%
76%
56%
51%
62%
35%
% MagRE Recovery
Pr
Tb
Dy MagRE
%
%
%
%
42% 48% 44%
44%
73% 75% 74%
74%
41% 40% 38%
43%
63% 66% 64%
64%
75% 71% 67%
76%
55% 57% 56%
56%
51% 48% 46%
51%
60% 60% 58%
61%
38% 43% 39%
36%
Sample Selection
location, rock type,
colour
(brown, red, grey
clay)
(grey clay)
(cream, grey clay)
(brown, green clay)
(brown clay)
4
Composite ID
SRAC0301 21-33m
% MagRE Recovery
Nd
Pr
Tb
Dy MagRE
%
%
%
%
%
44% 43% 49% 50%
44%
90% 90% 84% 80%
90%
46% 46% 49% 48%
46%
69% 69% 66% 62%
69%
1%
1% 20% 28%
3%
52% 48% 49% 51%
51%
71% 70% 79% 79%
72%
75% 73% 76% 73%
74%
79% 78% 74% 70%
78%
46% 38% 47% 47%
44%
56% 50% 66% 66%
56%
9%
8% 15% 16%
10%
43% 38% 50% 51%
42%
61% 58% 64% 64%
60%
57% 56% 58% 56%
57%
51% 53% 54% 51%
52%
49% 50% 56% 53%
49%
48% 47% 58% 55%
48%
82% 81% 78% 74%
81%
8%
8% 10% 8%
8%
48% 48% 54% 54%
48%
10% 9% 16% 16%
10%
12% 9% 22% 20%
12%
3%
3% 5% 5%
3%
49% 46% 50% 45%
48%
60% 58% 60% 56%
59%
34% 32% 43% 42%
34%
SRAC0302 27-41m
1031
251
66%
68%
63%
61%
66%
(black clay)
SRAC0303 21-39m
1024
221
53%
52%
52%
48%
53%
(dark grey clay)
SRAC0307 18-27m
2605
624
27%
25%
24%
25%
27%
(brown clay)
SRAC0308 12-24m
1629
342
12%
10%
14%
14%
12%
(cream, dark grey clay)
SRAC0310 36-42m
973
231
20%
19%
20%
17%
20%
SRAC0310 42-50m
1502
374
68%
65%
73%
72%
67%
SRAC0311 42-60m
1138
285
58%
57%
62%
63%
59%
(grey clay)
SRAC0314 27-39m
1615
242
39%
39%
42%
40%
39%
(grey clay)
SRAC0325 33-43m
SRAC0326 18-27m
SRAC0327 30-45m
SRAC0328 24-42m
SRAC0328 42-52m
SRAC0330 30-45m
SRAC0333 30-42m
Centre
North
SRAC0333 42-73m
SRAC0335 39-60m
SRAC0337 39-51m
SRAC0337 51-63m
SRAC0338 30-42m
SRAC0339 51-63m
SRAC0340 48-60m
SRAC0340 60-72m
SRAC0469 39-48m
SRAC0469 48-70m
SRAC0291 21-33m
SRAC0291 33-49m
SRAC0297 18-27m
SRAC0297 27-36m
SRAC0298 12-27m
SRAC0298 27-47m
SRAC0300 12-21m
SRAC0300 21-39m
Centre
Sample Selection
location, rock type,
colour
Head Assay
TREO MagREO
ppm
ppm
2457
682
2811
618
1207
270
1564
348
1160
252
1696
338
3218
1013
1064
286
1061
226
870
181
1287
327
1338
351
1616
411
1571
344
2033
377
1265
342
1638
367
1384
305
809
184
1834
456
1833
432
1497
352
1885
487
2421
589
845
136
1504
381
940
175
SRAC0300 39-55m
(black clay)
(brown clay)
(white clay)
(grey clay)
(grey clay)
(grey clay)
(grey clay)
(grey clay)
(grey clay)
(brown, grey clay)
(grey, brown clay)
(brown, black clay)
(brown, grey, black
clay)
(grey clay)
(brown clay)
(grey, brown clay)
(brown, grey clay)
(grey clay)
Note: There will be some variation between original head grade total assay and the sum of residual solid and liquor assays which is not
accounted for. Recoveries only reflect initial rare earth leaching, with further losses expected in precipitation, impurity removal,
purification and drying.
5
Figure 4: Centre Prospect REE Recovery by Element (>40% MagREO recovery)
Prop Prospect Results
Prop Prospect results are presented in Table 2 and Figure 5. The Prop Prospect is located at the lowest elevation
at Splinter Rock and is surrounded by Booanya granite to the north and south, is interpreted to be a paleo-valley
filled with clay, featuring multiple feeder channels.
Based on the recovery results it can be observed that:
•
MagRE Recoveries (extractions) across all four MagRE elements are more variable, averaging between
41% and 77%.
•
Areas on the margin of clay basin and also to the west have lower recovery, most likely due to the
transition between clay and saprock caused by weathering.
•
The highest recoveries are located in the centre of the Prop deposit along a central NW to SE channel
•
Other rare earth elements are recovered in similar quantities with most elements exhibiting a broader
range of recoveries
•
Some black carbonaceous shales (black clay) have been located in parts of the basin and are likely
remnants of a historic estuarine river. Recoveries and grades of rare earth located in this carbonaceous
material are generally lower and have a corresponding increase in sulphur levels.
Table 2: Prop Prospect MagRE acid leach recovery for various drill hole locations, intercepts and sample types
Composite ID
Prop
Nd
%
19%
% MagRE Recovery
Pr
Tb
Dy MagRE
%
%
%
%
14% 23% 21%
18%
Sample Selection
location, rock type,
colour
229
49%
48% 43% 44%
49%
(brown, green clay)
356
54%
51% 56% 58%
53%
(grey, brown, purple
clay)
SRAC0361 30-42m
Head Assay
TREO MagREO
ppm
ppm
817
195
SRAC0371 48-56m
923
SRAC0377 39-61m
1644
(Red, brown clay)
6
Composite ID
Head Assay
TREO MagREO
ppm
ppm
Nd
%
% MagRE Recovery
Pr
Tb
Dy MagRE
%
%
%
%
SRAC0385 24-39m
1027
216
0%
-1%
4%
3%
0%
SRAC0397 24-33m
911
990
935
1229
677
715
779
543
3315
843
1026
1510
1114
1502
1217
1166
988
905
1590
1252
865
199
168
200
262
146
160
174
165
828
207
207
358
264
361
272
277
241
242
401
300
215
66%
56%
11%
50%
48%
67%
69%
47%
69%
41%
29%
-7%
-3%
49%
-4%
14%
43%
33%
37%
43%
78%
61%
50%
14%
49%
41%
64%
63%
40%
68%
37%
25%
-9%
-9%
53%
-1%
17%
40%
29%
38%
45%
76%
70%
32%
21%
44%
59%
68%
66%
51%
74%
32%
35%
-5%
-9%
29%
1%
14%
30%
43%
39%
44%
68%
69%
27%
20%
42%
60%
67%
65%
52%
72%
31%
32%
-3%
-7%
24%
2%
11%
29%
46%
42%
42%
66%
65%
53%
12%
49%
47%
66%
68%
46%
69%
39%
28%
-7%
-4%
49%
-3%
14%
41%
33%
37%
43%
77%
SRAC0397 54-68m
SRAC0398 21-33m
SRAC0398 33-45m
SRAC0398 45-54m
SRAC0399 18-27m
SRAC0399 27-37m
SRAC0401 66-78m
SRAC0402 18-21m
SRAC0403 42-57m
SRAC0403 57-68m
SRAC0404 12-24m
SRAC0406 24-33m
SRAC0406 33-56m
SRAC0408 15-39m
SRAC0410 30-54m
SRAC0410 54-66m
SRAC0411 36-57m
SRAC0425 45-82m
SRAC0432 27-41m
SRAC0433 12-27m
Sample Selection
location, rock type,
colour
(red clay)
(grey, red clay)
(grey clay)
(grey clay)
(brown clay)
(red clay)
(brown clay)
(brown clay)
(grey clay)
(grey clay)
(grey, brown clay)
(grey, brown clay)
(black, grey clay)
(brown clay)
(brown clay)
Figure 5: Prop Prospect REE Recovery by Element (>40% MagREO recovery)
7
Leach Conditions
OD6 and ANSTO have developed a project specific bottle roll test procedure utilising a 25 g/L hydrochloric acid
solution, nominally maintained at 30C and ambient pressure, with a 4 wt% solids density over a 24-hour period.
Recoveries are then calculated based on the difference between the assayed solid head and solid residue using a
4-acid digestion method.
This procedure was developed and benchmarked against previous tests to achieve results equivalent to
diagnostic leach tests using a 25 g/L hydrochloric acid, at notionally ambient conditions and pressures, over a 6hour period. The leach conditions were selected based on previously announced works for consistency (refer
ASX announcements, 27 February 2024, 7 November 2023 and 3 April 2023). Further optimisation works will be
undertaken in future test work programs.
The bottle roll method is devised to be an inexpensive and fast technique for determining the leachability of
samples. ANSTO utilises a 4 wt% solids density for all clay hosted rare earth projects inclusive of acid soluble and
ionic diagnostic tests. Once further bench scale testing is undertaken, it is anticipated that a slurry density of
between 25 and 30% is likely to be optimal, as has been recorded on a number of other projects, with little to no
decrease in leach recoveries.
Test work results should be interpreted in the context of geological setting, selection of known non-clay samples
to identify boundary limits, and OD6’s objectives to test various clay types to identify areas of favourable
geology and metallurgy whilst delineating the extent of these areas.
Assay Method
The Splinter Rock clay hosted prospect areas are characterised by a combination of ionically adsorbed, acidsoluble and refractory rare earth elements (REEs). Our chosen assay method (4-acid digestion) does not report
the refractory rare earth component, aiming to eliminate the variable grade proportion of the refractory
material, which could introduce modelling errors in the future.
Work conducted by OD6 continues to demonstrate that utilising the alternative Lithium Borate Fusion Digest
method can increase the head grade by up to 30% compared to the 4-acid assay method. However, it is
important to note that this extra grade is highly unlikely to be recoverable in any proposed clay hosted rare
earth process flowsheet.
All assays contained in this ASX announcement are based on the 4-acid soluble digestion method, rather than
the ALS Lithium Borate Fusion Digest method, aligning with OD6’s reporting of geological drill assays and the
Mineral Resource Estimate.
It should be acknowledged that future potential commercial production of REE is significantly improved through
successful leaching of both ionic and acid-soluble REEs.
8
Forward Works Program
•
Incorporation of Results into Mineral Resource Estimate: Evaluate and potentially upgrade the Mineral
Resource Estimate based on the latest results.
•
Bench Scale Tests: Perform bench scale tests to determine preferred slurry densities and further optimize
leach conditions.
•
Slurry Leach Tests: Conduct slurry leach tests to evaluate slurry handling, filtration, and washing
processes.
•
Impurity Removal Trials: Conduct impurity removal trials under various pH conditions, temperatures,
and with different reagents.
•
Assessment of Resin Use: Evaluate the potential use of resins in both pulp and liquid phases to assist in
impurity removal.
•
Ion Exchange Assessment: Assess ion exchange processes on "leach" liquor and investigate selective
elution of REE versus impurities such as Al and Fe.
•
Nanofiltration Evaluation: Evaluate nanofiltration processes to produce a retentate with increased REE
concentration and a permeate containing clean acid for recycling.
•
Mixed Rare Earth Precipitation: Investigate mixed rare earth precipitation methods, including
carbonates and hydroxides.
•
Process Modelling and Techno-Economic Comparison: Develop process models and conduct technoeconomic comparisons of various flowsheet options.
•
Mini Pilot Scale Testing: Conduct mini pilot scale testing using composited bulk samples to validate
findings on a smaller scale.
•
Conversion of Rare Earth Carbonate/Hydroxide: Apply process models to assess options for converting
mixed rare earth carbonate/hydroxide in a downstream refinery to multiple potential rare earth oxides.
9
Competent Persons Statement
Information in this report relating to Exploration Results is based on information reviewed by Mr Jeremy Peters
who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and a Chartered Professional Geologist
and Mining Engineer of that organisation. Mr Peters is a Director of Burnt Shirt Pty Ltd, consulting to OD6 and
has sufficient experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration
and to the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the 2012 Edition of
the Australasian Code for reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Mr Peters
consents to the inclusion of the data in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this report relating to the Mineral Resource estimate for the Splinter Rock Project is extracted
from the Company’s ASX announcement dated 18 July 2023. OD6 confirms that it is not aware of any new
information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement and that all
material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral Resource estimate continue to apply.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain information in this document refers to the intentions of OD6 Metals, however these are not intended to
be forecasts, forward looking statements, or statements about the future matters for the purposes of the
Corporations Act or any other applicable law. Statements regarding plans with respect to OD6 Metals projects
are forward looking statements and can generally be identified by the use of words such as ‘project’, ‘foresee’,
‘plan’, ‘expect’, ‘aim’, ‘intend’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘may’, ‘should’, ‘will’ or similar expressions. There
can be no assurance that the OD6 Metals plans for its projects will proceed as expected and there can be no
assurance of future events which are subject to risk, uncertainties and other actions that may cause OD6 Metals
actual results, performance, or achievements to differ from those referred to in this document. While the
information contained in this document has been prepared in good faith, there can be given no assurance or
guarantee that the occurrence of these events referred to in the document will occur as contemplated.
Accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted by law, OD6 Metals and any of its affiliates and their directors,
officers, employees, agents and advisors disclaim any liability whether direct or indirect, express or limited,
contractual, tortuous, statutory or otherwise, in respect of, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the
information in this document, or likelihood of fulfilment of any forward-looking statement or any event or
results expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement; and do not make any representation or warranty,
express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information in this document, or
likelihood of fulfilment of any forward-looking statement or any event or results expressed or implied in any
forward-looking statement; and disclaim all responsibility and liability for these forward-looking statements
(including, without limitation, liability for negligence).
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of OD6 Metals Limited
10
About OD6 Metals
OD6 Metals is an Australian public company pursuing exploration
and development opportunities within the critical mineral
sector. The Company has successfully identified clay hosted rare
earths at its 100% owned Splinter Rock and Grass Patch Projects,
which are located in the Esperance-Goldfields region of Western
Australia - about 30 to 150km northeast of the major port and
town of Esperance.
Drilling and geological analysis at its flagship Splinter Rock has
shown widespread, thick, high-grade clay hosted REE deposits that
extend over hundreds of square kilometres. Metallurgical testing
using hydrochloric acid to leach the rare earths have resulted in
positive REE recoveries with optimisation ongoing.
The Company aims to delineate and define economic resources
and reserves of Rare Earth Elements (REE), in particular Neodymium (Nd), Praseodymium (Pr), Dysprosium (Dy) and Terbium
(Tb), which can be developed into a future revenue generating mine. Clay REE deposits are currently economically extracted
in China, which is the dominant world producer of REEs.
REE are becoming increasingly important in the global economy, with uses including advanced electronics and permanent
magnets in electric motors. As an example, a neodymium magnet used in a wind turbine or electric vehicle motor is 18
times stronger than a standard ferrite magnet significantly increasing energy use efficiency.
As part of the exploration process the Company has entered into heritage agreements with Esperance Tjaltrjraak Native Title
Aboriginal Corporation and the Ngadju Native Title Aboriginal Corporation that serves to both enable exploration and protect
important cultural sites on Country.
Corporate Directory
Managing Director
Mr Brett Hazelden
Non-Executive Chairman
Dr Darren Holden
Non-Executive Director
Mr Piers Lewis
Non-Executive Director
Dr Mitch Loan
Financial Controller/ Joint Company Secretary
Mr Troy Cavanagh
Joint Company Secretary
Mr Joel Ives
Exploration Manager
Tim Jones
Contact
OD6 Metals Ltd
ACN 654 839 602
www.od6metals.com.au
Mail to: info@od6metals.com.au
Phone: +61 8 6189 8515
Level 1, 50 Kings Park Road, West Perth, WA 6005
PO Box 277, North Beach, WA 6920
PO Box 2009, Esperance, WA 6450
11
Metallurgical Drill Hole Location Details
Hole ID
Type
Easting
Northing
RL (m)
Dip
(degrees)
End of Hole
(m)
SRAC0291
Aircore
499186
6338152
206
-90
49
SRAC0297
Aircore
497503
6336490
204
-90
36
SRAC0298
Aircore
497181
6336252
202
-90
47
SRAC0300
Aircore
496404
6336432
208
-90
55
SRAC0301
Aircore
496028
6336565
212
-90
36
SRAC0302
Aircore
497440
6334719
205
-90
41
SRAC0303
Aircore
497223
6334383
205
-90
43
SRAC0307
Aircore
498089
6335722
202
-90
27
SRAC0308
Aircore
498313
6336054
203
-90
27
SRAC0310
Aircore
498814
6336676
208
-90
50
SRAC0311
Aircore
499097
6336958
205
-90
60
SRAC0314
Aircore
499566
6338039
205
-90
41
SRAC0325
Aircore
501855
6341344
203
-90
43
SRAC0326
Aircore
501260
6341403
203
-90
55
SRAC0327
Aircore
501763
6341732
203
-90
60
SRAC0328
Aircore
501762
6342132
204
-90
52
SRAC0330
Aircore
501756
6342932
205
-90
49
SRAC0333
Aircore
502529
6343475
201
-90
73
SRAC0335
Aircore
503329
6343487
195
-90
60
SRAC0337
Aircore
504100
6343677
195
-90
63
SRAC0338
Aircore
504472
6343823
194
-90
56
SRAC0339
Aircore
504861
6343919
193
-90
63
SRAC0340
Aircore
505260
6344002
193
-90
72
SRAC0356
Aircore
501767
6337263
206
-90
79
SRAC0357
Aircore
502068
6336999
205
-90
95
SRAC0358
Aircore
502177
6336615
204
-90
84
SRAC0359
Aircore
501939
6336293
204
-90
87
SRAC0361
Aircore
515633
6324245
147
-90
49
SRAC0371
Aircore
515666
6326792
148
-90
56
SRAC0377
Aircore
518227
6328120
149
-90
61
SRAC0385
Aircore
514718
6325247
147
-90
40
SRAC0397
Aircore
517487
6329839
147
-90
68
12
Hole ID
Type
Easting
Northing
RL (m)
Dip
(degrees)
End of Hole
(m)
SRAC0398
Aircore
517215
6330131
143
-90
54
SRAC0399
Aircore
516907
6330385
146
-90
37
SRAC0401
Aircore
516895
6329352
149
-90
81
SRAC0402
Aircore
516495
6329353
146
-90
21
SRAC0403
Aircore
516095
6329354
147
-90
68
SRAC0404
Aircore
515694
6329357
147
-90
69
SRAC0406
Aircore
514893
6329362
149
-90
56
SRAC0408
Aircore
514091
6329364
146
-90
40
SRAC0410
Aircore
516577
6330149
150
-90
66
SRAC0411
Aircore
516580
6330549
146
-90
60
SRAC0425
Aircore
520849
6333885
158
-90
82
SRAC0432
Aircore
517069
6335615
154
-90
41
SRAC0433
Aircore
516744
6335759
153
-90
27
SRAC0469
Aircore
501662
6341390
203
-90
70
SRAC0470
Aircore
502305
6336788
203
-90
60
13
JORC 2012 – Table1: Splinter Rock
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Sampling techniques
•
•
•
•
•
Drilling techniques
Drill sample recovery
•
•
•
•
Logging
•
•
•
Sub-sampling techniques
and sample preparation
•
•
•
•
•
•
Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut
channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement
tools appropriate to the minerals under
investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples should not be taken as
limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
Include reference to measures taken to ensure
sample representivity and the appropriate
calibration of any measurement tools or
systems used.
Aspects of the determination of mineralisation
that are Material to the Public Report.
In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has
been done this would be relatively simple (eg
‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain
1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised
to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In
other cases more explanation may be
required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual
commodities or mineralisation types (eg
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of
detailed information.
Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, openhole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka,
sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, facesampling bit or other type, whether core is
oriented and if so, by what method, etc).
Method of recording and assessing core and
chip sample recoveries and results assessed.
Measures taken to maximise sample recovery
and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade and whether sample bias
may have occurred due to preferential
loss/gain of fine/coarse material.
Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral
Resource estimation, mining studies and
metallurgical studies.
Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
If core, whether cut or sawn and whether
quarter, half or all core taken.
If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled,
rotary split, etc and whether sampled wet or
dry.
For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
Quality control procedures adopted for all subsampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the
grain size of the material being sampled.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Geochemical sampling was undertaken by
sampling of metre interval samples returned from
the cyclone of a conventional air core drilling rig.
Certified reference samples, duplicates and blank
samples were inserted into the sample stream
such as to represent approximately 5% of the
samples submitted to the laboratory for analysis
Two composite samples were collected over three
metre intervals – the first (the A sample) being
submitted for laboratory analysis and the second
(the B sample) being retained as a reference.
A sample from each metre was collected and
stored in a chip tray for logging and x-ray
diffraction analysis
Air core drilling was completed by hammer and
blade industry standard drilling techniques
Aircore is considered to be an appropriate drilling
technique for saprolite clay
Drilling used blade bits of 87mmØ with 3m length
drill rods to blade refusal.
Air core recoveries were not recorded but are not
considered to be materially biased, given the
nature of the geology and samples.
The assay data will be analysed against control
samples and historical assays for any indications
of bias
The Competent Person considers that due to the
nature of the drilling and geology, sample bias is
unlikely to result from poor recovery.
All chips were logged qualitatively and
quantitatively.
A sample from each metre was collected and
stored in a chip tray for logging
Geological logs recorded lithology, colour and
weathering.
The Competent Person considers that the logging
protocols are sufficient to support estimation of a
Mineral Resource.
A composite sample of ~ 3kg for analysis was
taken using a scoop from each metre pile to
subsample 1 to 1.5kg sample. This was then
dispatched to the laboratory.
A second composite sample was similarly taken
and stored on site as a reference
Air core samples were a mix of wet and dry
Certified reference samples, duplicates and blank
samples were inserted into the sample stream
such as to represent approximately 5% of the
samples submitted to the laboratory for analysis
The Competent Person considers to be
appropriate the measures taken to demonstrate
that sample protocols were appropriate and
unbiased.
14
Criteria
JORC Code explanation
Commentary
Quality of assay data and
laboratory tests
•
•
•
•
Verification of sampling
and assaying
•
•
•
•
The natur
Share your feedback
Discover