ADVANCED SATELLITE ANALYSIS REVEALS 8KM TARGET CORRIDOR
Released
Released
Announcement PDF
ASX Announcement
25 March 2026
ASX: OD6
1
ADVANCED SATELLITE ANALYSIS REVEALS 8KM EPITHERMAL
TARGET CORRIDOR AT QUINN FLUORSPAR PROJECT, NEVADA
OD6 Metals Limited (ASX: OD6, “OD6” or “the Company”) is pleased to announce the results of
advanced satellite and airborne hyperspectral analysis, which has identified a large-scale epithermal
alteration system extending over 8km at the Quinn Fluorspar Project in Nevada, USA.
This work significantly enhances the geological understanding of the project and highlights the
potential for large-scale, high-grade fluorspar mineralisation beyond known historicaloccurrences
HIGHLIGHTS
• Advanced satellite and airborne spectral analysis confirms extensive epithermal alteration system
• 8km long regional target alteration zone from Dress Circle to Mammoth
• 1.1km long high intensity alteration zone linking Horseshoe to Jumbo prospects
• Dress Circle: a 2km by 1.8m zone of intense alteration in limestone associated with arcuate features,
indicating potential for an intrusive source at depth.
• Scale of alteration indicates historic outcropping discoveries potentially join into globally significant
target zones along preferred stratigraphic horizons.
Figure 1 Frontispiece: EnMap alteration index draped on elevation model with fluorspar occurrences.
View NW. (refer Figure 2 for descriptions)
2
Managing Director Brett Hazelden, commented:
“The Quinn Fluorspar Project prospects have had little to no exploration for over 60 years with the original
discoveries limited to outcropping fluorspar occurrences. With low-vegetation cover, stratigraphic control and
alteration signatures, this area lends itself to low-cost modern remote-sensing exploration.
Recent advances in satellite imagery and spectral analyses have shown a remarkable scale to epithermal alteration
that hosts the known fluorspar historic mines/occurrences The scale of the alteration system, over 8km with intense
zones of >1km strike, assists in targeting globally significant fluorspar systems at the Quinn Fluorspar Project.
Importantly, this work demonstrates that known high-grade occurrences at Horseshoe and Mammoth are likely part
of a much larger, continuous mineralised system.
As we prepare for on-ground exploration, these results provide strong confidence in our targeting strategy and
materially increase the potential for new discoveries and scale beyond historic workings.”
About Quinn Fluorspar Project
On 4 March 2026 the Company announced an exclusive option agreement to acquire the Quinn Fluorspar
Project, located approximately 220km north of Las Vegas, Nevada. The project offers very high-grade fluorspar
mineralization (>40% CaF2) identified at the Mammoth and Horseshoe Projects in replacement / breccia
style mineralization mapped out over large 9,000m2
and 3,000m2
areas respectively. In addition, a number
of other fluorspar occurrences are noted in the wider project area with reported historic rock chip results up to
94% CaF2.
The United States is currently 100% reliant on imports of fluorspar. Fluorspar is listed on the Critical Minerals list
with applications in battery technologies, AI chip manufacture, nuclear fuels industry, aerospace and
defence technologies. The project is located ~300km by road from the US Strategic Minerals Reserve at
Hawthorne, Nevada (refer to Company announcements 4/3/2026, 6/3/2026, & 16/03/2026).
About Remote-Sensing Technologies for Alteration Mapping
Quinn Fluorspar project is a series of replacement/breccia style and vein style deposits hosted in limestone
and other carbonate rocks. Replacement style offer high-grade mineralization (>40% CaF2) and the
potential for bulk tonnages with mineralization identified over 20 to 60m widths. Vein style mineralization
offer the potential for 1 to 5m wide structures with ultra-high grades (70 to >90% CaF2).
Epithermal (hot-water driven by volcanism) emplaced fluorspar into the limestones around 30 to 50 million
years ago. This process also altered the surrounding rock and resulted in a number of different styles of
alteration minerals. Mapping the alteration of rocks assists greatly with targeting and prioritizing the area for
discovery.
Some alteration minerals have a different reflectance of light compared to other minerals and can be detected
by using spectral analysis by satellite or airborne techniques. Whilst gravel cover, slope direction, surface water,
soil and vegetation can impede reflectance, the Quinn Project lends itself to such analysis due to the high-
desert environment and in-places, excellent outcrop. Historic deposits were discovered outcropping on the
side of hills, but replacement style deposits preference specific stratigraphic layers, which may continue and be
capped by altered rocks.
3
The Company recruited remote sensing consultant, Grant Boxer, to aid with analysis. Using the EnMap satellite
imagery (30m pixel) it is possible to discern phyllic alteration and silicification – two different styles of alteration,
but both indicative of fluid flow in this epithermal terrain (refer JORC Table 1 below for description).
The phyllic style of alteration is closely associated with replacement/breccia style mineralization at the
Horseshoe and Mammoth deposits. The silicification is associated with felsic dyke swarms but is also indicative
of silicified limestone and the Lithocap (fossilised hot-spring terraces) proximal to the Jumbo, Big Jim, Spar,
North Horseshoe and Rocket occurrences.
Overall, this work showed alteration over a 8km long target corridor.
This work also identified the “Dress Circle” anomalism, a previously un-explored 1.8 by 2km zone of intense
alteration in limestones associated with a series of circular to arcuate structures. These arcuate structures are
indicative of collapse zone potentially related to an intrusive mineral source at depth source at depth (Figure 2).
Figure 2. (Left) Alteration interpretation overlying geological interpretation with mineral occurrences and target zones. (Right) The
processed alteration map from EnMap spectral satellite imagery: green shades indicate phyllic alteration; red shades indicate silica
alteration or silica rocks; pale blue indicates unaltered carbonate rocks
4
A high-resolution (15m pixel) airborne technique, the AVIRIS airborne hyper-spectral system, was flown by
NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in August 2025. Using AVIRIS, specific alteration minerals were able to be
identified (refer JORC Table 1 below for description of technique).
Of significance are the following spectral minerals identified:
o Pyrophyllite – hydrous aluminium-silicate mineral indicative of high-acidic epithermal fluids
o Alunite-Dickite- potassium-aluminium sulphate and phyllosilicate (clay-mica) minerals, which together
indicate high-temperature advanced argillic alteration of feldspars
o Muscovite-Illite – two mica/clay minerals, which together indicate strong phyllic alteration
o Phengite – a silica rich muscovite that indicates strong phyllic alteration
Collectively the detection of these minerals indicate a strong hydrothermal corridor which links Horsehoe-
North Horseshoe-Jumbo fluorspar occurrences.
This presents a 1.1km target corridor where the replacement/breccia style mineralization (as is outcropping at
Horseshoe) is potentially linked under shallow cover in a continuous target zone to N. Horseshoe, with
other highly altered material at Jumbo Prospects (Figure 3).
In addition, a jasperoid body has been identified and indicative of limestone entirely replaced by silica and
iron. The scale of this series of anomalies provides targets that potentially elevate the historic occurrences to a
potentially significant target zone.
The presence of pyrophyllite-alunite-dickite on the Lithocap provides increased confidence for targets
beneath the Lithocap (estimated 20 to 40m beneath the surface).
5
Figure 3 AVIRIS hyperspectral alteration map showing the potential continuations of the Horseshoe Corridor.
6
Updated Mineral Occurrences for the Quinn Fluorspar Project
This report refers to mineral occurrences compiled by the Company. The Company continues to review historic
reports. In addition to those mineral occurrences reported in release dated 4 March 2026, new occurrences (or
alternative locations) were noted in a report by Union Carbide Corporation in a report in 1958 (Wharton, 1958).
Table 1 Updated Mineral Occurrence (NAD83 Zone 11)
Name Easting Northing Style Source
Big Jim 616065 4221750 Vein Quade, 84
Horseshoe 615615 4220483 Replacement/Breccia Quade, 84
Jumbo 615787 4221173 Replacement/Breccia Papke, 1979
Jumbo 2 616176 4221312 Replacement/Breccia Wharton, 1958
Mammoth 617878 4223653 Replacement/Breccia Quade, 84
N. Horseshoe 1 615800 4220800 Replacement/Breccia Quade, 84
N. Horseshoe 2 615852 4221080 Replacement/Breccia Wharton, 1958
Rocket 1 615650 4221486 Vein Papke, 1979
Rocket 2 615664 4221635 Vein Wharton, 1958
Spar #1 617055 4221742 Vein Wharton, 1958
Spar Mine 616531 4221813 Vein Quade, 84
References
Bakker W et al., (2024). Hyperspectral Python, Algorithms,17(8), Article 337
ENVI spectral indices - https://www.nv5geospatialsoftware.com/docs/SpectralIndices.html
Papke, K.G. (1979). Fluorspar in Nevada. Nevada Bureau of Mines & Geology, Bulletin 93.
Quade, (1984). Prospect Descriptions, Nye & Lincoln County Fluorspar. On File Nevada Bureau of Mines &
Geology
Van Ruitenbeek F J A et al., (2025). A Knowledge-based Strategy for Interpretation of SWIR Hyperspectral
Images of Rocks. Remote Sensing, 17(15), 2555.
Wharton, H.M., (1958). Summary Report on the Fluorspar Deposits, Union Carbide Higrade Claims, Nye County,
Nevada. Union Carbide Corporation. August 27, 1958.
Due Diligence and Next Steps
As part of its due diligence program in connection with the Quinn Fluorspar Project (see announcement dated 4
March 2026, “OD6 TO ACQUIRE ULTRA HIGH GRADE USA FLUORSPAR PROJECTS”), OD6 intends to collect new
samples from the surface showings to test the veracity of historic reports, including:
• Conduct systematic surface rock chip and channel sampling
• Verify historic assay grades
• Complete detailed geological mapping and structural interpretation
• Undertake soil geochemistry sampling and testing
• Develop and prioritise drill targets across the district
• Commence permitting requirements for the initial drill program
• Review metallurgical sampling and testing needs
7
Figure 4 Quinn Fluorspar Location in Nevada.
8
Forward Looking Statements
Certain information in this document refers to the intentions of OD6 Metals, however these are not intended to
be forecasts, forward looking statements, or statements about the future matters for the purposes of the
Corporations Act or any other applicable law. Statements regarding plans with respect to OD6 Metals projects
are forward looking statements and can generally be identified by the use of words such as ‘project’, ‘foresee’,
‘plan’, ‘expect’, ‘aim’, ‘intend’, ‘anticipate’, ‘believe’, ‘estimate’, ‘may’, ‘should’, ‘will’ or similar expressions. There
can be no assurance that the OD6 Metals plans for its projects will proceed as expected and there can be no
assurance of future events which are subject to risk, uncertainties and other actions that may cause OD6 Metals
actual results, performance, or achievements to differ from those referred to in this document. While the
information contained in this document has been prepared in good faith, there can be given no assurance or
guarantee that the occurrence of these events referred to in the document will occur as contemplated.
Accordingly, to the maximum extent permitted by law, OD6 Metals and any of its affiliates and their directors,
officers, employees, agents and advisors disclaim any liability whether direct or indirect, express or limited,
contractual, tortuous, statutory or otherwise, in respect of, the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the
information in this document, or likelihood of fulfilment of any forward-looking statement or any event or
results expressed or implied in any forward-looking statement; and do not make any representation or warranty,
express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability or completeness of the information in this document, or
likelihood of fulfilment of any forward-looking statement or any event or results expressed or implied in any
forward-looking statement; and disclaim all responsibility and liability for these forward-looking statements
(including, without limitation, liability for negligence).
Competent Persons Statement
Information in this report relating to geological interpretation is based on information reviewed by Dr Darren
Holden who is a Fellow of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
Dr Holden is an employee of GeoSpy Pty Ltd and is a geological advisor to the Company and has sufficient
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the
activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the 2012 Edition of the
Australasian Code for reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves. Dr Holden owns
shares in the Company and participates in the Company’s employee securities incentive plan. Dr Holden
consents to the inclusion of the data in the form and context in which it appears.
No new information
Except where explicitly stated, this announcement contains references to prior exploration results, all of which
have been cross-referenced to previous market announcements made by the Company. The Company confirms
that it is not aware of any new information or data that materially affects the information included in the
relevant market announcements.
The information in this report relating to the Mineral Resource estimate for the Splinter Rock Project is extracted
from the Company’s ASX announcements dated 18 July 2024. OD6 confirms that it is not aware of any new
information or data that materially affects the information included in the original announcement and that all
material assumptions and technical parameters underpinning the Mineral Resource estimate continue to apply.
This announcement has been authorised for release by the Board of OD6 Metals Limited
9
About OD6 Metals
OD6 Metals is an Australian public company pursuing exploration and development opportunities within the critical minerals
sector, namely rare earths, copper and fluorspar.
Rare Earth Elements
OD6 Metals has successfully identified clay hosted rare earths at its 100% owned Splinter Rock Project which is located in
the Esperance-Goldfields region of Western Australia.
The Company released a Mineral Resource Estimate (MRE) for Splinter Rock in May 2024, confirming that the project hosts
one of the largest and highest-grade clay-hosted rare earths deposits in Australia with an Indicated Resource of 119Mt @
1,632ppm TREO and an Inferred Resource of 563Mt @ 1,275ppm TREO with an overall ratio of ~23% high-value Magnetic
Rare Earths (MagREE).
An innovative Process Flow sheet has been selected utilising Heap Leaching, Nano-filtration and Ion Exchange Technologies
that have achieved ~75% Nd & Pr overall recovery, produced a high-quality Mixed Rare Earth Carbonate or Hydroxide
(MREC/H) of ~56-59% TREO, with low levels of impurities (Al, Fe, P, Si) and extremely low uranium and thorium content.
Fluorspar (Fluorite)
The Company secured an option to acquire the Quinn Fluorspar Project in Nevada, USA. Nevada is regarded as one of the
world’s premier mining jurisdictions and is currently ranked second in the 2025 Fraser Institute’s Mining Attractiveness Index.
Historically a number of the Quinn Fluorspar deposits were mined in the 1950’s for Fluorspar. In 1969. The United States
Geological Survey (USGS) conducted a survey and confirmed fluorspar grading up to 72% CaF2 in bulk samples.
The USA currently imports 100% of all Fluorspar consumed domestically with 68% of all global supply sourced from China
(USGS 2024). Fluorspar is listed as a Critical Mineral by the USGS and is essential in the production of hydrofluoric acid, AI
semi-conductor chip etching, advanced battery technologies and nuclear fuel processing with other applications in defence
and aerospace technologies.
Copper
The Company is advancing the Gulf Creek Copper-Zinc VMS Project located near the town of Barraba in NSW.
Gulf Creek was mined at around the turn of the 20th century and was once regarded as the highest-grade copper mine (2%
to 6.5% Cu) in NSW until its closure due to weak copper prices in 1912. Very little exploration has occurred at the project in
over 100 years, with OD6 aiming to apply modern day exploration technologies.
The 2025 maiden drilling program successfully defined high grade copper below the historical mine plus confirmed the
strong relationship between magnetism and massive sulphide mineralisation. Geophysical modelling has identified multiple,
high priority and targets providing over >3km of strike in the immediate mine-stratigraphy, and over >10km across the
tenement.
Corporate Directory
Managing Director
Non-Executive Chairman
Non-Executive Director
Financial Controller/ Joint Company Secretary
Joint Company Secretary
Technical Advisor to the Board
Contact
OD6 Metals Ltd
ACN 654 839 602
www.od6metals.com.au
Mail to: info@od6metals.com.au
Phone: +61 8 6189 8515
Level 1, 1 Alvan Street, Subiaco, WA 6008
Mr Brett Hazelden
Mr Piers Lewis
Dr Mitch Loan
Mr Troy Cavanagh
Mr Joel Ives
Dr Darren Holden
Investor Relations
Lucas Robinson
Corporate Storytime
lucas@corporatestorytime.com
Phone: +61 408 228 889
10
JORC 2012 – Table 1: Quinn Fluorspar Project
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling techniques • Nature and quality ofsampling (eg cut channels,
random chips, or specific specialised industry
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole
gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc).
These examples shouldnotbe takenas limitingthe
broad meaning of sampling.
• Include reference to measures taken to ensure
sample representivity and the appropriate
calibrationofany measurement tools or systems
used.
• Aspects ofthe determination ofmineralisation that
are Material to the Public Report.
• In cases where ‘industrystandard’ work has been
done this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse
circulationdrilling was used to obtain 1 m samples
from which 3 kgwas pulverised toproduce a 30 g
charge for fire assay’). In other cases more
explanationmay be required, such as where there
is coarse gold that has inherent sampling
problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation
types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information
• No sampling reported
Drilling techniques • Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic,
etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or
standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-
samplingbitor other type, whether core is oriented
and if so, by what method, etc).
• No drilling reported
Drill sample recovery • Method ofrecordingand assessing core and chip
sample recoveries and results assessed.
• Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and
ensure representative nature of the samples.
• Whether a relationship exists between sample
recovery and grade andwhether sample bias may
have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
• No drill sampling reported
Logging • Whether core and chip samples have been
geologically andgeotechnically logged toa level of
detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource
estimation, mining studies and metallurgical
studies.
• Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc)
photography.
• The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
• No logging reported
Sub-sampling techniques
and sample preparation
• Ifcore, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter,
half or all core taken.
• Ifnon-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry.
• For all sample types, the nature, quality and
appropriateness of the sample preparation
technique.
• Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-
sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
• Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is
representative of the in situ material collected,
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
• Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the material being sampled.
• No sampling reported
11
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Quality of assay data and
laboratory tests
• The nature, quality and appropriateness of the
assaying and laboratory procedures used and
whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
• For geophysicaltools,spectrometers,handheldXRF
instruments, etc, the parameters used in
determining the analysis including instrument
make and model, reading times, calibrations
factors applied and their derivation, etc.
• Nature ofqualitycontrol procedures adopted (eg
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels ofaccuracy
(ie lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
• The Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program
(EnMap) is a German hyperspectral satellite
mission that monitors and characterises Earth’s
environment on a global scale (www.enmap.org).
The EnMap satellite collects spectral data in the
range of 420 to 2450 nm (246 spectralbands) with
a 30 km swath width at a spatialresolution of 30 m.
Images were produced based on the ENVI spectral
indices.
• The AVIRIS data used in the Quinns area was
obtained from two east-west strips of data collected
on the 1st
August 2025, scenes
f250801t01p00r08_rfl and f250801t01p00r10_rfl.
This data has a pixel size of 15 m and was
processed in QGIS using a recently developed
process based on ENVI spectral indices and the
Hyperspectral Python (HypPy, Bakker 2024)
program. The mineral class maps were based on
decision tree algorithms based on a paper by van
Ruitenbeek (2025).
Verification of sampling
and assaying
• The verification of significant intersections by
either independent or alternative company
personnel.
• The use of twinned holes.
• Documentation of primary data, data entry
procedures, data verification, data storage
(physical and electronic) protocols.
• Discuss any adjustment to assay data.
• No sampling reported in this release
Location of data points • Accuracy and quality ofsurveys used to locate drill
holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches,
mine workings and other locations used inMineral
Resource estimation.
• Specification of the grid system used.
• Quality and adequacy of topographic control.
• Mineral occurrences as referenced in Table 1 in the
body of this release.
Data spacing and
distribution
• Data spacing forreportingofExploration Results.
• Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree ofgeological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s)
and classifications applied.
• Whether sample compositing has been applied.
• No sampling reported in this release.
Orientation of data in
relation to geological
structure
• Whether the orientation of sampling achieves
unbiased samplingofpossible structures and the
extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
• Ifthe relationshipbetween the drilling orientation
and the orientation ofkey mineralised structures is
considered tohave introduced asamplingbias, this
should be assessed and reported if material.
• No sampling reported in this release.
Sample security • The measures taken to ensure sample security. • No sampling reported in this release.
Audits or reviews • The results of any audits or reviews of sampling
techniques and data.
• Reviews ofconsultantprovidedimagery andprocessing
was carried out by the Competent Person – Dr Darren
Holden of GeoSpy.
12
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this section)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral tenement and
land tenure status
• Type, reference name/number, location and
ownership including agreements or materialissues
with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title
interests, historical sites, wilderness or national
park and environmental settings.
• The security of the tenure held at the time of
reportingalongwith any known impediments to
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
• 48 state of Nevada Mining Claims under option
• Staked in 2025 and filed in early 2026.
• Projects fall on FederalLand (National Forest) but are
outside of the designated Wilderness Study Areas
• The transaction terms include a 2% NSR on future
production. Applicable State Royalties will apply.
• Future work such as drilling requires permitting
through the US Forest Service
• New permits appliedfor as noted in release 16 March
2026
Explorationdone by other
parties
• Acknowledgmentandappraisal of exploration by
other parties.
• NA
Geology • Deposit type, geological setting and style of
mineralisation.
• Principal host rocks are Paleozoic limestones and
dolomites which have been altered by epithermal
activity from Cenozoic volcanism and intrusions.
• Fluorspar is reported as replacement/breccia deposits
in limestone, epithermal veins and vein/breccias.
Drill hole Information • A summary of all information material to the
understanding ofthe explorationresults including
a tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes:
o easting and northing of the drill hole collar
o elevation or RL (Reduced Level – elevation
above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
o dip and azimuth of the hole
o down hole length and interception depth
o hole length.
• Ifthe exclusion of this information is justified on
the basis that the informationis not Material and
this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding ofthe report, the CompetentPerson
should clearly explain why this is the case.
• No drilling reported
Data aggregation methods • In reporting Exploration Results, weighting
averagingtechniques, maximumand/or minimum
grade truncations (eg cuttingof high grades) and
cut-offgrades are usually Material and should be
stated.
• Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short
lengths ofhighgrade results and longer lengths of
low grade results, the procedure used for such
aggregation should be stated and some typical
examples ofsuch aggregations should be shownin
detail.
• The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
• No data aggregation reported
Relationship between
mineralisationwidths and
intercept lengths
• These relationships are particularly important in
the reporting of Exploration Results.
• Ifthe geometry ofthe mineralisation with respect
to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should
be reported.
• Ifit is not known and only the down hole lengths
are reported, there shouldbe a clear statement to
this effect (eg ‘down hole length, true width not
known’).
• No widths reported
Diagrams • Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations ofintercepts should be includedfor any
significant discoverybeing reported. These should
include, but notbe limited to a plan view of drill
hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
• Diagrams are included at relevant sections in this
Report
Balanced reporting • Where comprehensive reportingofallExploration • NA
13
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Results is not practicable, representative reporting
ofboth low andhighgrades and/orwidths should
be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
Other substantive
exploration data
• Other explorationdata, ifmeaningfulandmaterial,
should be reportedincluding (but not limited to):
geological observations; geophysical survey
results; geochemicalsurvey results; bulk samples –
size and method oftreatment; metallurgical test
results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical
and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
• As reported in the body of the release.
Further work • The nature and scale ofplanned further work (eg
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or
large-scale step-out drilling).
• Diagrams clearlyhighlighting the areas ofpossible
extensions, including the main geological
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided
this information is not commercially sensitive.
• As part ofdue diligence, the Company has completed
initial sampling
• The Company intends to commence on-ground surface
exploration in the near-future.
Share your feedback
Discover