Announcement PDF ASX Announcement 12 August 2026 ASX: OD6 1 HIGHLIGHTS • Highly encouraging TOMRA ore sorting results demonstrate clear discrimination between high- grade fluorspar, lower-grade/mixed material and barren waste • Comprehensive ~166kg metallurgical sample suite selected across discrete mining domains, spanning high and medium-grade mineralisation plus low/no-grade hanging-wall, footwall and internal waste, capturing mining dilution and feeding both the TOMRA and Core Resources programmes • Exceptional head grades confirmed across all four principal mineralised domains, 98.3% CaF₂ Big Jim main vein, 90.0% CaF₂ Horseshoe high-grade mineralisation, 86.7% CaF₂ Blue Bell main vein, 76.2% CaF₂ Horseshoe breccia mineralisation, 40.4% CaF₂ Mammoth breccia mineralisation • Independent QXRD mineralogy strongly corroborates the exceptional fluorspar content, returning 98.6% fluorite Big Jim, 90.4% fluorite Horseshoe, 91.6% fluorite Blue Bell, 48.5% fluorite Mammoth • Importantly, QXRD identified fluorite as the only fluorine-bearing mineral, supporting the interpretation of the fluorine assays • Very low levels of gangue and deleterious elements arsenic, cadmium, base-metals, sulphur or uranium - meets Metspar and Acidspar product requirements even before upgrade • TOMRA's Laser and XRT technologies demonstrate the ability to separate ore from waste, supporting rejection of mining dilution at coarse particle size before milling and flotation • Exceptional natural grades combined with proven ore-sorting performance support a low-CAPEX Direct Shipping Metspar product with minimal beneficiation, offering near-term cash flow potential ahead of a full flotation circuit • Upgraded feed can also be directed to flotation for production of higher-value Acidspar Frontispiece – Laser ore-sorting technology by TOMRA applied to Quinn Project metallurgical samples. This clearly differentiates ore types and provides low-cost path to upgrade of mineral products with coarse crush only. Samples approximately 10-15mm. ENCOURAGING ORE SORTING RESULTS HIGHLIGHT POTENTIAL FOR LOW-COST UPGRADING AT HIGH-GRADE QUINN FLUORSPAR 2 • Early waste rejection has the potential to increase CaF₂ feed grade while reducing tonnes reporting to downstream processing, potentially reducing: o grinding and milling power requirements o grinding media and equipment wear o flotation reagent consumption o water consumption o tailings generation • Big Jim is particularly exceptional, with the main-vein sample returning 98.3% CaF₂ by head assay and 98.6% fluorite by QXRD before beneficiation, already exceeding the typical CaF₂ grade requirement for Acidspar. Further product-quality testing is required to determine whether a directly saleable product can be produced • Core Resources' comprehensive metallurgical program is progressing to plan, integrating mineralogy, size-by-assay, grind optimisation, Heavy Media Separation (HMS), rougher and cleaner flotation and impurity characterisation • Following the encouraging TOMRA sighter results, OD6 intends to progress larger-scale ore-sorting trials using approximately 500-1,000 kg bulk samples to establish quantitative mass rejection, grade uplift and recovery performance Managing Director Brett Hazelden, commented: “These results are exciting not simply because of the exceptional grades, but because they are beginning to show us how the different mineralisation styles at Quinn could potentially be mined and processed. We deliberately did not just send TOMRA and Core our best-looking fluorspar. We selected discrete samples representing high and medium-grade mineralisation together with hanging-wall, footwall and internal waste so that we could understand how mining dilution may behave and, importantly, whether it can be removed before milling. At Blue Bell, Big Jim and Horseshoe, TOMRA has demonstrated very clear discrimination between these material types. This potentially gives us the ability to reject waste at a coarse crush size, upgrade selected material towards a Metspar product and substantially reduce the tonnes that ultimately need to be ground and floated to produce higher-value Acidspar. The head grades themselves are exceptional. Big Jim returned 98.3% CaF₂, Horseshoe 90.0% CaF₂ and Blue Bell 86.7% CaF₂, with independent QXRD mineralogy confirming these samples are overwhelmingly comprised of fluorite with relatively simple gangue mineralogy. We are particularly encouraged by Big Jim, where the main-vein sample is already above the typical CaF₂ grade required for Acidspar before beneficiation. At Horseshoe and Blue Bell, the combination of naturally high grades, low impurities and strong ore-sorting discrimination creates significant optionality for both Metspar and Acidspar production routes. The Core Resources programme is progressing to plan and will now take these same representative material types through grind optimisation, HMS and flotation. Combined with larger-scale TOMRA sorting trials, this work will allow us to develop an integrated processing flowsheet specifically designed around the different mineralisation domains at Quinn. With the USA importing 100% of its fluorspar and classifying it as a critical mineral, a clean, high-grade Nevada source is exactly what the US supply chain, including the US military, are looking for.” 3 Quinn Metallurgical Development Test Work Program OD6 Metals Limited (ASX: OD6) ("OD6" or "the Company") is pleased to report highly encouraging head assay, mineralogical and preliminary sensor-based ore sorting results from its ongoing metallurgical development program for the Quinn Fluorspar Project in Nevada, USA. The results represent an important step in the systematic development of the Quinn processing strategy and follow the Company's previously announced review of historic metallurgical testwork, which demonstrated the potential to produce both metallurgical-grade fluorspar (Metspar) and acid-grade fluorspar (Acidspar) products from Quinn mineralisation. The current program combines modern mineralogical characterisation and conventional beneficiation studies being undertaken by Core Resources in Brisbane with sensor-based ore sorting investigations undertaken by global sorting technology company TOMRA at its Test Centre in Wedel, Germany. Preliminary characterization work has been received and is presented in this release. This on-going work will involve milling and flotation tests to achieve the targeted Metspar (>60% CaF2) and Acidspar (>97% CaF2) products. Metallurgical Samples Designed to Test Mining Dilution and Processing Response A total of approximately 166 kg across 11 large-format samples from Mammoth, Blue Bell, Horseshoe and Big Jim was delivered for the metallurgical program, with individual samples ranging from approximately 8 to 25 kg. These large format samples were collected and composited from different localities within four projects (Horseshoe, Big Jim, Blue Bell and Mammoth) to build a representivity of typical ore types as well as waste rock and mixed waste/ore as exposed at surface at the Quinn Project. Importantly, the metallurgical sampling program was not designed to preferentially select only high-grade fluorspar. OD6 deliberately collected discrete samples representing the principal geological and potential mining domains observed at each deposit, including: • high-grade mineralisation • medium and lower-grade mineralisation • mixed ore and host rock • breccia mineralisation (broken or fragment mineral and rocks cemented together in a matrix) • footwall material • hanging-wall material • internal waste/host rock The objective is to understand how each material type may behave during future mining and processing and, in particular, assess the potential impact of mining dilution. The same discrete material types form the basis of the TOMRA ore-sorting investigation and Core Resources beneficiation program, allowing the Company to evaluate the potential processing pathway for each mineralisation and waste domain. The inclusion of deliberately low-grade and barren samples is therefore an important part of the program. For example, Blue Bell samples range from 86.7% CaF₂ in the main vein to 0.4% CaF₂ in hanging-wall volcanic waste, providing strongly contrasting end-members against which sensor-based sorting can be evaluated. Horseshoe similarly includes high-grade mineralisation together with approximately 7.4% CaF₂ 4 host/internal limestone, while Big Jim includes the exceptionally high-grade main vein and lower-grade footwall breccia. This approach provides a more realistic basis for evaluating future mining dilution and the ability to reject waste before downstream processing. TOMRA Preliminary Ore Sorting Summary Results OD6 Metals has joined with TOMRA, a world-leading sorting sensor company with a test centre in Germany and offices in Australia, to conduct preliminary sighter tests on product from the metallurgical samples. TOMRA XRT technology is currently utilised to help remove waste from feed at the Las Cuevas fluorspar mine in Mexico TOMRA were presented with coarse (5 to 12mm) representative samples from the metallurgical samples. The samples were evaluated using: Laser sorting – which evaluates differences in surface properties, colour, brightness and crystalline characteristics; and X-Ray Transmission (XRT) – which differentiates particles according to differences in atomic density. The preliminary investigation successfully demonstrated the ability to distinguish fluorite-rich material from lower-grade and waste material. At Horseshoe, Laser sorting demonstrated clear differentiation between the two styles of high-grade fluorspar and the limestone host/internal dilution material. At Big Jim, both Laser and XRT clearly differentiated the massive high-grade fluorspar vein from footwall and hanging-wall material. At Blue Bell, the volcanic host rock provided particularly strong contrast to the fluorspar veins, with both Laser and XRT demonstrating clear differentiation between the ore and waste domains. The results indicate that even lower-grade fluorspar-bearing footwall material may potentially be amenable to upgrading through ore sorting. At Mammoth, preliminary sorting was less definitive due to similarities between crystalline quartz and fluorite- bearing material. Mammoth remains primarily a bulk-tonnage beneficiation target, with HMS and flotation investigations forming an important component of the ongoing Core Metallurgy program. Preliminary characterization work has been received and is presented in this release from the four projects (Horseshoe, Big Jim, Blue Bell and Mammoth). 5 Acidspar and Metspar Fluorspar (also known as fluorite) is a simple mineral with the formula CaF2, which contains 48.9% fluorine by weight. Fluorspar is the main mineralogical source of fluorine. High-grade fluorspar mineralisation is typically upgraded through simple processing to produce concentrates known as Metspar and Acidspar. MetSpar is a mineral product containing >60% fluorspar (CaF2) and is sold to the steel industries as a fluxing agent. As a fluxing agent, the MetSpar improves slag fluidity, remove impurities, lower the melting temperature, protects refractory materials and is used to enhance high-end stainless steel products. MetSpar typical needs to be: • >60% CaF2 • less than 5,000ppm lead (Pb) • less than 3,000ppm sulphur (S) AcidSpar is an upgraded mineral product containing >97% fluorspar (CaF2) and is sold to the chemical industry for hydrofluoric acid production, and ultimately is used in the nuclear fuels industry, battery technologies, solar panels, defence technologies and AI chip manufacturing. AcidSpar specifications typically need to be: • >97% CaF2 • <1.5% silica (SiO2), • <10-20ppm arsenic, • <1,000ppm sulphur (S) • <100-550ppm phosphorous (P). • Penalties or refusal are potentially applied for high lead (Pb) and other base-metals (Cu, Zn, Mo), and pollutants such cadmium, chromium or any radioactive elements such as uranium or thorium. Why Ore Sorting could be Important for Quinn Sensor-based ore sorting can potentially be positioned immediately following primary/coarse crushing to produce a Metspar product or before energy intensive grinding and flotation, to produce a Acidspar product Metspar generally requires substantially less beneficiation than Acidspar. Selected high-grade Quinn material may therefore have the potential to be crushed, sorted and sized to produce a coarse Metspar product without requiring the entire material stream to undergo fine grinding and flotation. The conceptual processing sequence Metspar becomes: ROM Ore → Crushing → Sensor-based Sorting → Waste Rejection / Potential Coarse Product → Metspar This could potentially provide: • a relatively simple processing route • lower power requirements • reduced water demand • reduced capital intensity • greater flexibility between Metspar and future Acidspar production 6 The conceptual processing sequence Acidspar becomes: ROM Ore → Crushing → Sensor-based Sorting → Waste Rejection / Potential Coarse Product → Grinding → Flotation → Acidspar Rather than processing all mined material through the milling and flotation circuit, sensor sorting potentially allows barren or low-grade mining dilution to be rejected at a relatively coarse particle size. This could provide a number of material benefits to a future Quinn development, including early waste rejection that has the potential to increase CaF₂ feed grade while reducing tonnes reporting to downstream processing, potentially reducing: • grinding and milling power requirements • grinding media and equipment wear • flotation reagent consumption • water consumption • tailings generation QXRD Preliminary Ore Sorting Results Core Resources has conducted independent quantitative x-ray diffraction (QXRD) studies on the mineralogy of samples, with analysis providing strong corroboration of the exceptional fluorite content of the high-grade samples. Importantly these works show no other fluorine bearing minerals other than fluorspar, with coarse quartz, calcite and minor clays as the principal gangue minerals. Quartz and calcite can potentially be removed using ore- sorting and flotation. This relatively simple mineralogy is encouraging for beneficiation because the principal gangue minerals are well understood and can be targeted through ore sorting, density separation and/or flotation. QXRD is a mineralogical technique and should not be interpreted as replacing quantitative chemical assay. Its close correlation with the head assay results nevertheless provides valuable independent mineralogical support for the exceptionally high fluorite content observed. Results are presented in this release from the four projects (Horseshoe, Big Jim, Blue Bell and Mammoth). Very Low Impurity Levels Multi-element characterisation of the metallurgical samples has also returned very low concentrations of a range of potentially deleterious elements within the high-grade fluorspar material. Arsenic, cadmium, base-metals, sulphur and uranium achieve metspar and acidspar requirements even before upgrade, providing encouraging characteristics for production of Metspar and, subject to product-quality testwork, potentially Acidspar The combination of high CaF₂ grades, relatively simple gangue mineralogy and low concentrations of potentially deleterious elements is encouraging for the production of clean fluorspar concentrates. Detailed product-quality assessment will form part of the ongoing metallurgical program. Results are presented in this release from the four projects (Horseshoe, Big Jim, Blue Bell and Mammoth). 7 HORSESHOE SPECIFICATIONS AND RESULTS • 90% CaF2 (fluorspar) assay for raccoon tail textured fluorspar type (90.4% on mineralogy QXRD test) • 76.2% CaF2 assay for fluorspar breccia type (79.3% on mineralogy XRD test) • 7.4% CaF2 assay for country rock limestone (with veins of fluorspar) (7.8% on mineralogy QXRD test) • Gangue minerals (from mineralogical studies on ore) consist only of quartz (7.3% to 9%), kaolinite (1.3 to 1.4%) and calcite (0.9 to 10.3%) indicating the potential for flotation of a very clean final product • Very low deleterious elements The Horseshoe Deposit is a replacement style epithermal fluorspar deposit exposed over approximately 3000 square metre zone (~60m x 50m) and extends up-dip into the hill and down-dip beneath talus slope cover. The thickness of this shallowly dipping body, as estimated from historic drilling and geological mapping, is 20 to 30m, with a footwall mixed limestone-fluorspar breccia of unknown thickness adding the potential for an increase of this width. Channel sampling has revealed spectacular grades and with spectacular grades and width including 50m @ 63.9% CaF2 and 15m @ 75.8% CaF2 (refer ASX announcements 4 March 2026, 15 April 2026, 8 July 2026). Three large format samples were collected and sent to Brisbane for this test work. These included: 1. Horseshoe Met #1: the raccoon tail textured fluorspar from several sites within the historic open pit 2. Horseshoe Met #2: brecciated fluorspar from several sites within the historic open pit. 3. Horseshoe Met #3: from a limestone host, including rafts of limestone ~2m thick from within the historic open pit. Horseshoe Met #1 and Horseshoe Met #2 showed higher grades than previous channel sampling in these area s with assays of 90.4% CaF2 (Horseshoe Met #1) and 76.7% CaF2 (Horseshoe Met #2). Furthermore, the host rock limestone returned an assay of 7.4% CaF2, indicating low-grade halo and will perhaps reduce the risk of dilution from over-break when mining. Multi-element analysis shows very low deleterious elements as noted in Table 1 and Table 2 below. Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction (QXRD) analysis of minerals show that the samples are dominated by fluorspar with quartz, calcite and minor clay minerals (kaolinite) present. This provides the potential for a very clean product with the high-grade ore already exceeding metspar requirements, and a low-upgrade ratio to achieve an acidspar product. The ore-sorting work showed clear differentiation between two different styles of high-grade material, and the country rock. 8 Figure 1 Ore sorting of various metallurgical sample types from Horseshoe by TOMRA. Laser Technology clearly differentiates between types 9 BIG JIM SPECIFICATIONS AND RESULTS • 98.3% CaF2 assay for massive fluorspar vein (>2m thick) (98.6% on mineralogy QXRD test) • 27.8% CaF2 assay for footwall breccia with mixed fluorspar and limestone (35% on mineralogy QXRD test) • Gangue minerals in the high-grade vein consist of 0.1% quartz, 0.4% calcite and 0.9% kaolinite • Gangue minerals in the fluorspar matrix of the footwall breccia consist of 61.1% quartz, 0.1% calcite, 3.7% kaolinite • Very low deleterious elements The Big Jim target is a high grade shallow dipping vein approximately 2m thick. It is exposed in historic workings over an outcrop of several metres, though historic mine plans indicate a strike length of approximately 230m. The hanging wall of the main vein consists of a silicified jasperoid body, which marks the Saw Mill Thrust. The footwall consists of a fluorspar matrix breccia with large clasts of limestone/dolomite (refer asx announcement 12 May 2026) Two large format samples were collected and sent to Brisbane for this test work. These included: 1. Big Jim Met #1: the massive fluorspar vein 2. Big Jim Met #2: brecciated fluorspar / limestone from the footwall. The grades returned from the main vein corroborate the historic reports (up to 98.6% CaF2). The footwall sample was lower grade than the historic work, though this may have been biased to the limestone clasts. A sample of the hanging wall was not taken for metallurgical testwork as the contact with the main vein is very sharp (the jasperoid acting as an impervious aquitard) and no fluorspar was observed. However, a sample of the hanging wall was included in the ore-sorting test (Big Jim Met 3). Multi-element analysis shows very low deleterious elements as noted in Table 1 and Table 2 below. Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction (QXRD) analysis of minerals show that the samples are dominated by fluorspar with quartz, calcite and minor clay minerals (kaolinite) present. The ore-sorting work showed clear differentiation between the main vein, the limestone in the footwall vein and the hanging wall vein. Further product-quality testing is required to determine whether a directly saleable product can be produced 10 Figure 2. Ore sorting of various metallurgical sample types from Big Jim by TOMRA. Both Laser and XRT Technology clearly differentiates between ore and waste types 11 BLUE BELL SPECIFICATIONS AND RESULTS • 86.7% CaF2 assay for massive fluorspar vein (1 to 2m thick) exposed in historic pit (91.6% on mineralogy from QXRD tests) • 9.9% CaF2 assay for footwall fluorspar in stockwork zone hosted in volcanics (11.4% on mineralogy from QXRD test) • 0.4% CaF2 assay from hanging wall volcanic waste • Gangue minerals in the high-grade vein are 7.5% quartz, 0.6% calcite with minor clays. • Gangue minerals in the footwall volcanics include 60.6% quartz, 21.8% feldspar and minor clays • Very low deleterious elements The Blue Bell Project was recently staked by the Company and has been visited to collect metallurgical samples. Channel samples have also been collected and are pending assay. The project consists of a 1 to 2m high-grade vein which dips steeply to the north and which outcrops in an historic open pit over 60m strike. The footwall consists of stockwork fluorspar veins in a volcanic host with a zone with a width of 12 to 20 metres. The mineralized zone is open along strike to the west (refer ASX announcement 23 June 2026) Three large format samples were collected and sent to Brisbane for this test work. These included: 3. Blue Bell Met #1: the massive fluorspar vein 4. Blue Bell Met #2: stock fluorspar veins hosted in volcanics from the footwall 5. Blue Bell Met #3: hanging wall unmineralized volcanics The grades returned from the main vein corroborate the historic reports of grade from Blue Bell. Multi-element analysis shows very low deleterious elements as noted in Table 1 and Table 2 below. Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction (QXRD) analysis of minerals show that the samples are dominated by fluorspar with quartz, calcite and minor clay minerals (kaolinite) present. The volcanics consist of quartz and feldspar. The ore-sorting work at Blue Bell showed perhaps the strongest and easiest project to ore-sort. The volcanics clearly differentiate from the fluorspar bearing veins in both the XRT and Laser methods. Despite the lower grades in the footwall, this material appears to be readily upgradeable with ore-sorting technologies. 12 Figure 3 Ore sorting of various metallurgical sample types from Blue Bell by TOMRA. Both Laser and XRT Technology clearly differentiates between ore and waste types 13 MAMMOTH SPECIFICATIONS AND RESULTS • 40.4% CaF2 assay for main fluorspar breccia (48.5% on mineralogy QXRD test) • 24.7% CaF2 for banded breccia (27.7% on mineralogy QXRD test) • 10.9% CaF2 for mixed veins in footwall limestone (13.8% on mineralogy QXRD test) Whilst Mammoth is a lower grade than Horseshoe, it is still considered high-grade when compared to other deposits worldwide (refer presentation 31 July 2026). Mammoth is a breccia body currently interpreted to be steeply dipping. The inferred footprint extends over 9000 square metres with a strike of approximately 250 metres, and with a thickness of 50 to 60 metres. Three large format samples were collected and set to Brisbane for this test work. These included: 1. Mammoth Met #1: the main fluorspar breccia 2. Mammoth Met #2: banded breccia with quartz 3. Mammoth Met #3: footwall limestone with stock work of quartz veins The head-assay results at Mammoth are consistent with previous channel sampling and visual observation of fluorspar. Multi-element analysis shows very low deleterious elements as noted in Table 1 and Table 2 below. Quantitative X-Ray Diffraction (QXRD) analysis of minerals show that the samples are dominated by fluorspar with quartz, calcite and minor clay minerals (illite) present. Ore sorting at Mammoth appears to have been less-effective than at Horseshoe, Big Jim and Blue Bell, with sorting technologies not readily differentiating between crystalline quartz and fluorspar. Mammoth represents a bulk-tonnage target for processing for flotation for acidspar products. Core Resources Program Progressing to Plan The comprehensive metallurgical program being undertaken by Core Resources is progressing in accordance with the planned schedule. The program has been specifically designed to build on historical Quinn metallurgical work while applying modern analytical, mineralogical and beneficiation techniques to representative material from Horseshoe, Mammoth, Blue Bell and Big Jim. The program incorporates: • Head characterisation • Mineralogy and liberation • Heavy Media Separation • Grind Establishment • Flotation The current Core program schedule shows head characterisation and mineralogical activities leading into grind establishment, HMS and rougher flotation, followed by cleaner flotation and final reporting through the second half of 2026. The program is ultimately intended to determine the optimum integrated flowsheet for Quinn rather than assuming that every mineralisation type requires the same level of beneficiation. 14 Next Steps OD6's metallurgical development program will now focus on: 1. Core Resources testwork – continue grind establishment, liberation, HMS, rougher and cleaner flotation optimisation across representative Quinn mineralisation types. 2. Larger-scale TOMRA sorting trials – collect approximately 500–1,000 kg representative samples to quantify: • waste mass rejection; • CaF₂ grade uplift; • fluorite recovery; • optimal crush/sort particle size; and • potential product streams. 3. Metspar product assessment – determine whether selected high-grade sorted material can meet relevant physical and chemical Metspar product specifications with minimal downstream processing. 4. Acidspar flotation optimisation – determine optimum grind size, reagent regime and cleaner circuit configuration to produce >97% CaF₂ Acidspar while controlling key impurities. 5. Integrated process flowsheet – combine ore sorting, HMS, grinding and flotation results to determine the optimum processing route for the different Quinn mineralisation domains. 6. Future development studies – incorporate the resulting metallurgical parameters into future project engineering and economic studies. Figure 4 Wider Quinn Fluorspar Project with additional prospects recently staked (refer announcement dated 23 June 2026) 15 Figure 5 Quinn Fluorspar Project with, deposit locations, background geology, soil sampling results and alteration map (refer release dated 1 July 2026. 16 Table 1 Ore characterization results from Core Resources Ltd for Horseshoe and Mammoth Mammoth MET 1 Mammoth MET 2 Mammoth MET 3 BlueBell MET 1 BlueBell MET 2 BlueBell MET 3 Horseshoe MET 1 Horseshoe MET 2 Horseshoe MET 3 BigJim MET 1 BigJim MET 2 Description Main CaF2 Breccia Banded CaF2 Breccia Footwall CaF2 veins in limestone Main CaF2 Vein Hanging Wall Volcanic (waste) Footwall Veins in Volcanic Raccoon Tail CaF2 CaF2 Breccia Host / internal Limestone Main Big Jim Vein Big Jim Footwall Breccia Received Weight (Kg) 24.7 8.64 18.67 14.28 10.25 12.8 17.57 13.68 16.69 16.9 12.22 Elemental ICP Scan Al (ppm) 4690 6032 7328 5053 64770 37020 3519 2625 5969 2664 13900 Ca (ppm) 209000 187000 291000 430000 16900 51300 453000 427000 308000 494000 145000 Fe (ppm) 1820 2200 3400 804 14400 7850 1090 2380 3340 316 5890 K (ppm) 3360 3110 4410 2720 40300 23600 358 411 962 79 938 Mg (ppm) 709 1700 3276 125 5341 2255 164 158 1396 216 463 Mn (ppm) 21 111 159 117 252 121 27 162 132 3 25 Na (ppm) < 210 < 210 < 210 < 210 9080 633 < 210 < 210 < 210 363 < 210 P (ppm) 105 147 188 < 63 291 203 348 429 532 502 1040 Si (ppm) 109400 103200 86990 54530 258200 230800 38730 54910 76180 4486 131800 Ti (ppm) 86 173 211 58 1710 985 50 146 277 73 1000 ME-XRF24 Assay Al2O3 (%) 0.82 1.06 1.28 0.88 12.35 6.84 0.58 0.42 1.00 0.40 2.51 CaO (%) 30.20 27.00 42.70 >60 2.57 7.39 >60 >60 45.60 >60 20.90 F(%) 19.60 12.00 5.30 42.10 0.20 4.80 43.70 37.00 3.60 47.70 13.50 Fe2O3 (%) 0.25 0.31 0.46 0.13 2.12 1.14 0.17 0.34 0.49 0.05 0.84 K2O (%) 0.36 0.34 0.45 0.27 5.52 3.34 0.04 0.04 0.10 0.01 0.10 MgO (%) 0.12 0.30 0.60 0.03 1.00 0.42 0.04 0.03 0.23 0.05 0.09 MnO2 (%) <0.01 0.02 0.03 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.02 <0.01 0.01 Na2O (%) 0.01 0.01 <0.01 0.03 1.26 0.07 0.02 0.01 <0.01 0.05 <0.01 P2O5 (%) 0.02 0.03 0.03 <0.01 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.22 SiO2 (%) 57.00 56.90 23.60 11.85 70.60 76.30 7.87 11.65 18.45 0.51 66.50 TiO2 (%) 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.02 0.30 0.17 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.01 0.18 Total 101.4 100.7 99.9 103.5 99.5 100.5 103.3 102.1 99.8 103.1 101.2 LOI 1.12 7.62 27.59 1.05 3.18 1.81 1.29 4.87 31.55 0.79 1.92 Calculated CaF2 (%) 40.4 24.7 10.9 86.7 0.4 9.9 90.0 76.2 7.4 98.3 27.8 S-Speciation Elemental Sulphur (ppm) <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 <100 S2- (ppm) <100 161 363 656 821 <100 388 881 472 319 598 SO4 (ppm) <125 <125 <125 <125 <125 <125 <125 <125 <125 <125 <125 Total S (ppm) <60 195 397 677 836 110 400 891 493 422 659 QXRD (mineralogy) Fluorspar (%) 48.5 27.7 13.8 91.6 0.8 11.4 90.4 79.3 7.8 98.6 35.0 Quartz (%) 51.1 56.3 21.8 7.5 37.7 60.6 7.3 9.1 15.4 0.1 61.1 Calcite (%) 0.3 15.2 63.1 0.6 3.7 0.1 0.9 10.3 75.0 0.4 0.1 Orthoclase (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 34.5 21.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Albite (%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Kaolinite (%) 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 4.8 3.1 1.4 1.3 1.4 0.9 3.7 Illite (%) 0.1 0.6 0.7 0.0 4.1 2.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 Montmorillonite (%) 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Clinochlore-Fe (%) 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0